Administration tries to sidestep Congress on food policy
by Mike Ferguson | Presbyterian News Service
LOUISVILLE — The Office of Public Witness is calling on Presbyterians to speak against a proposed administrative rule revision that will eliminate food assistance benefits to nearly 3 million Americans.
According to Monday’s Action Alert, last month the Trump Administration proposed a rule that would eliminate the broad-based categorical eligibility option for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. That option, in place for more than 20 years, allows households with slightly higher incomes to be eligible for SNAP because they qualify for other assistance programs like Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.
Late last year while passing the 2018 Farm Bill, Congress rejected eliminating broad-based categorical eligibility. The United States Department of Agriculture says the proposed action “closes a loophole that allows states to make participants in certain programs ‘categorically eligible’ to participate in SNAP.” Some households, the USDA says, can qualify when they would not under regular program rules.
USDA said the rule would help to ensure “that eligibility for SNAP is consistent from state to state, and better aligns SNAP with other federal benefit programs for households in need.”
However, the Action Alert notes, SNAP “is one of the most effective safety net programs in our nation. The proposed rule would have a devastating impact on individuals and families, children, seniors, and people with disabilities who rely on SNAP for food assistance. In one of the wealthiest nations in the world, any governmental action that hinders a person’s ability to access nutritious food is unacceptable.”
Every human being has a fundamental right to sustenance, OPW said.
“As a Matthew 25 Church, we are called to ‘actively engage the world around us’ by eradicating systemic poverty,” the Action Alert states. “This means speaking out against policies that will increase food insecurity and push people deeper into poverty.”
The federal government has tips for submitting effective comments. Among them: “The comment process is not a vote — one well supported comment is often more influential than a thousand form letters.” And there’s this suggestion: “If you disagree with a proposed action, suggest an alternative (including not regulating at all) and include an explanation and/or analysis of how the alternative might meet the same objective or be more effective.”
You may freely reuse and distribute this article in its entirety for non-commercial purposes in any medium. Please include author attribution, photography credits, and a link to the original article. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeratives 4.0 International License.
Categories: Advocacy & Social Justice, Matthew 25
Tags: action and advocacy, administrative rule, eradicating systemic poverty, matthew 25 church, Presbyterian Office of Public Witness, supplemental nutrition assistance program, temporary assistance for needy families, united states department of agriculture
Tags: action alert, administrative rule, assistance benefits, assistance benefits to nearly 3, benefits to nearly 3, broad-based categorical, broad-based categorical eligibility, categorical eligibility, eliminate food, eliminate food assistance, eliminate food assistance benefits, food assistance, food assistance benefits, proposed, proposed action, proposed administrative, proposed administrative rule, proposed rule, speak against a proposed, speak against a proposed administrative
Ministries: Office of Public Witness, Matthew 25 in the PC(USA):
A bold vision and invitation