Theologians weigh in on the idea that our culture’s pervasive anger is tied to a lack of forgiveness
by Paul Seebeck | Presbyterian News Service
LOUISVILLE — An article published last month by Vox entitled “Everyone wants forgiveness, but no one is being forgiven” captured our attention. “Modern outrage is a cycle,” the subhead reads. “Could a culture of public forgiveness ever break it?”
The article suggests that in this “era of polarized politics, ‘cancel culture’ and the tendency of social media users to conduct informal modern tribunals without a lot of due process, seeking and granting public forgiveness is increasingly complicated.”
Presbyterian News Service sent this article to several theologians inviting them into a conversation about forgiveness, which seems to be, according to article, “perpetually beyond our reach.” Due to scheduling and personal preferences, we spoke with each of them individually by phone and email. Here are excerpts of our conversation.
(PNS) The article suggests that the anger in our culture is tied to a lack of forgiveness. What are your thoughts about this?
Dr. Susan E. Hylen, associate professor of New Testament, Emory Candler School of Theology: I would say the current anger in our culture comes from a lack of repentance. People don’t take the time to feel the remorse for what they’ve done. If there was real public remorse, a public apology forgiveness might actually happen. I think every time we teach people to forgive in the church, there should also be a teaching on repentance. How often do we sin against each other in church without going through the communal process of acknowledging the sin, the need to repent and then forgive?
Dr. Brian K. Blount, president and professor of New Testament, Union Presbyterian Seminary: Reparation and justice go along with forgiveness — recompense is built into it. True repentance creates the condition for forgiveness and for the relationship to be restored. You can’t truly build community and trust unless there is justice. The fundamental breakdown in community right now makes forgiveness very difficult.
Dr. William P. Brown, professor of Old Testament, Columbia Theological Seminary:
Presbyterians believe in total depravity. We are inclined toward immorality, which means we believe in the necessity and a culture of forgiveness. The culture of outrage feeds upon itself. Destructive anger takes up a lot of energy. It condemns and destroys others, including their reputation and livelihood. But a constructive form of outrage, such as in the form of protest expressed in the face of injustice, can be used to change systems.
(PNS) What thoughts did this article on forgiveness spark for you?
Brown: God is the supreme forgiver, always offering second chances and providing new beginnings. Released from sin, we no longer need to be caught up in the cycle of condemnation and destructive outrage. In Exodus 34:6-7, God confesses who God is. God’s most basic characteristic is God’s readiness to forgive. Nevertheless, forgiveness and accountability exist together. It’s easier to talk about forgiveness in an intimate relationship, where there’s clear communication, personal confession, and repentance, than in the public arena, which makes forgiveness more difficult but not impossible.
Blount: In the social media world it’s hard to establish a sense of community. People of different contexts and realities speak harshly against others of different contexts and realties. Social media is fast. It causes a breakdown, and people are unable to get to know each other. The classroom, at least for me, is a community where we listen to each other. Sometimes, we unintentionally or intentionally hurt someone. So, we grapple with issues of faith and justice, which allows forgiveness to take root. In the social media world, we don’t have that communal understanding. There’s not enough trust to get to repentance and forgiveness.
Hylen: Mundane, everyday forgiveness is most interesting to me, because it takes the kind of spiritual work Jesus talked about in Matthew 18. We always hear about the reference to forgive in Matthew 18:21-22 where Jesus tells Peter to forgive either 70 times 7, or 77 times. But the context for this comes after a long set of injunctions for the church (Matthew 18:15-20). Here is a communal process for forgiveness, which says to a person, “What you did is wrong. You need to acknowledge you got it wrong.” And if the person doesn’t listen, then one should distance themselves from the one who’s harmed them. We don’t necessarily acknowledge how important and how hard this work of repentance and forgiveness is.
When two other diverse Presbyterian theologians were unable to join the conversation, Blount suggested PNS reach out to Hylen. A former student of his, her first published article, “Forgiveness and Life in Community,” published by Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology, was a call for the church to respond to the crisis of domestic violence within a renewed vision of forgiveness.
You may freely reuse and distribute this article in its entirety for non-commercial purposes in any medium. Please include author attribution, photography credits, and a link to the original article. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeratives 4.0 International License.
Categories: Faith & Worship, Theological Education
Tags: anger, Columbia Theological Seminary, dr. brian k. blount, dr. susan e. hylen, emory candler school of theology, exodus 34:6-7, forgiveness, forgiveness and life in community, interpretation, matthew 18:15-20, matthew 18:21-22, office of theology and worship, presbyterian news service, rev. dr. william p. brown, theology, theology and worship, theology formation and evangelism, Union Presbyterian Seminary, vox
Ministries: Theology, Formation & Evangelism, Theology and Worship, Worship